• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

GP Synergy main website

ReCEnT

NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit

NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit

Menu
  • _0005_aboutAbout Us
    • Formed in 2016, the vision for the NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit is to be a major contributor to Australian and international educational research, and for research outcomes to inform the education and training of GP registrars.
    • ABOUT THE UNIT
      • Background
      • The Team
      • Strategic Plan
      • Grants
    • GET IN TOUCH
      • Contact us
      • Latest News
    • Close
  • _0003__Compound-Path_Research
    • The GP Synergy Research and Evaluation Unit conducts a range of research activities, with the centrepiece of our current research program being the research component of the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) project.
    • RESEARCH
      • Overview
      • All Research Projects
      • Current Projects
      • Completed Projects
    • GET INVOLVED
      • How to Collaborate with Us
      • Registrar Academic Training Posts
      • GP Synergy Medical Student Scholarships
    • Close
  • _0003__Compound-Path_Evaluations
    • GP Synergy is committed to conducting rigorous evaluation of its educational and training activities to inform continuous improvement and to ensure the highest standards of delivery are maintained.
    • OVERVIEW
      • Our approach
      • Our stakeholders
      • Our evaluation process
    • CASE STUDIES
      • Registrar Workshop Evaluation
    • Close
  • _0003__Compound-Path_ReCEnT Project

    • The ReCEnT project is a flagship general practice (GP) education and training project. It is the first of its kind to document Australian GP registrars’ educational and clinical experience over time.
    • ABOUT ReCEnT
      • What is ReCEnT?
      • How does ReCEnT work?
      • Information for participants
    • COLLABORATIONS
      • ReCEnT collaborators
      • How to get involved in ReCEnT
    • THEMES & PUBLICATIONS
      • Research Themes
      • ReCEnt Papers and Publications
    • Close
  • _0003__Compound-Path_Themes and Publications
    • View the NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit research themes and research findings.
    • THEMES
      • Research Themes
    • PUBLICATIONS
      • All Publications
      • Published Papers
      • Conference Presentations
      • Conference Workshops
      • Published Abstract Presentations
    • Close
  • _0001__Group_News
  • _0000__Group_Contact us
Home >> Latest News >> GP registrars’ management of urinary tract infection

GP registrars’ management of urinary tract infection

11 September, 2020 By kerryn

Evidence from the GP Synergy NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit – each month we present findings from our work that may be of interest to registrars and their supervisors.

Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common general practice presentation.

Antibiotics are the standard of care for UTIs but, as with any antibiotic use, antimicrobial resistance is a concern. Appropriate antibiotic stewardship in this situation includes: courses of antibiotics for no longer than needed; avoiding antibiotics if there is no UTI (involving decisions regarding empirical treatment versus waiting for pathology confirmation), and “getting the antibiotic right” first time.

So, in an analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) project, we aimed to describe registrars’ management choices made in prescribing antibiotics for UTI.

In our analyses, 1,333 registrars diagnosed 2,850 new UTIs during 189 736 consultations (1.5% of consultations; 95% CI, 1.4-1.6). Antibiotics were prescribed at 86% (95% CI, 84.7-87.2) of these index consultations. Antibiotic choice in most cases followed Australian eTG recommendations. Urine microscopy and culture were requested at the index consultation less than recommended by guidelines in men, 69.2% (95% CI, 62.6-75.1), and children, 80.8% (95% CI, 76.4-84.6). Adults were significantly more likely to be treated with antibiotics at the index consultation than children under 16.

Our interpretation of these findings is that Australian GP registrars’ choice of antibiotic for UTIs is consistent with guideline recommendations. Interpretation of the findings regarding investigation in children and men, and antibiotic prescribing in children, is more complex. These findings may be influenced by the single-consultation ‘snapshot’ nature of ReCEnT data collection. It is plausible that they may reflect registrars’ diagnostic uncertainty in the often-difficult clinical scenarios of possible UTIs in men and children – with consequent appropriate attention to antibiotic stewardship by deferring antibiotic prescription. This requires more research, focused on registrars, UTIs, and patient demographics.

Davey A, Tapley A, Mulquiney K, van Driel M, Fielding A, Holliday E, Ball J, Spike N, FitzGerald K, Magin P. Management of Urinary Tract Infection by early-career general practitioners in Australia. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (published online 25/12/19) DOI: 10.1111/jep.13340

If you would like to discuss this analysis or the paper, contact Parker Magin.

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

27
Oct

ReCEnT reflections – insights into problems seen by registrars

17
Sep

2019-2020 Research Annual Report now available!

Contact us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

© 2021 GP Synergy · All rights reserved · Privacy · Sitemap · Website by The DMA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
While the Australian Government Department of Health has contributed to the funding of this website, the information on this website does not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government and is not advice that is provided, or information that is endorsed by the Australian Government. The Australian Government is not responsible in negligence or otherwise for any injury, loss or damage however arising from the use of or reliance on the information provided on this website.